Wondering whether E950 or E960 is safer? We compared both ingredients based on independent research, regulatory status, and known health effects.
Quick Verdict
E960 is the safer choice based on current research.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Factor
E950
E960
Safety Rating
⚠️ Use With Caution
✅ Generally Safe
Safety Score
60/100
90/100
Category
artificial sweeteners
artificial sweeteners
About E950
EU code for acesulfame potassium. Artificial sweetener with limited long-term data.
About E960
EU code for stevia extract. Natural zero-calorie sweetener. Very safe.
E950 vs E960: Key Differences
E950 is rated caution while E960 is rated safe
E950 falls under the artificial sweeteners category
E960 falls under the artificial sweeteners category
There is a 30-point safety difference between them
Which Should You Choose?
Based on available research, E960 appears to be the safer option. However, individual sensitivities vary — scan any product with the free CheckIt app to get a personalized safety assessment.
EU code for acesulfame potassium. Artificial sweetener with limited long-term data.
Is E960 safe to eat?
EU code for stevia extract. Natural zero-calorie sweetener. Very safe.
Which is healthier: E950 or E960?
E960 has a better safety profile based on current research. Use the CheckIt app to scan products containing either ingredient for a detailed breakdown.
Can I avoid both E950 and E960?
Yes! The CheckIt app can filter products by specific ingredients you want to avoid. Scan any product to see all ingredients instantly.