Wondering whether E951 or E960 is safer? We compared both ingredients based on independent research, regulatory status, and known health effects.
E960 is the safer choice based on current research.
| Factor | E951 | E960 |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Rating | ⚠️ Use With Caution | ✅ Generally Safe |
| Safety Score | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Category | artificial sweeteners | artificial sweeteners |
EU code for aspartame. Controversial artificial sweetener classified as 'possibly carcinogenic' by IARC.
EU code for stevia extract. Natural zero-calorie sweetener. Very safe.
Based on available research, E960 appears to be the safer option. However, individual sensitivities vary — scan any product with the free CheckIt app to get a personalized safety assessment.
Scan Products Free with CheckIt →CheckIt AI. (2026). "E951 vs E960: Which Is Safer? (2026 Comparison)". Climaverse PBC. Retrieved from https://getcheck.it/compare/e951-vs-e960"E951 vs E960: Which Is Safer? (2026 Comparison)." CheckIt AI, Climaverse PBC, 2026-03-05. https://getcheck.it/compare/e951-vs-e960.<a href="https://getcheck.it/compare/e951-vs-e960">E951 vs E960: Which Is Safer? (2026 Comparison) — CheckIt AI</a>@misc{checkit2026comparee951vse960,
title = {E951 vs E960: Which Is Safer? (2026 Comparison)},
author = {CheckIt AI},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Climaverse PBC},
url = {https://getcheck.it/compare/e951-vs-e960},
note = {Retrieved 2026-03-05}
}